Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

235 N.C. 277

69 S.E.2d 534

Swaim v. Swaim

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1952

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1952-03-19

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 1963

8 state decisions

Relies on State v. . Parrott · Artis v. . Artis · Pilley v. Smith

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1952-03-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

'WinboRNE, J.

¶1 Since the sole error assigned by appellants on this appeal is to the signing of the judgment appearing of record, this is the pivotal question: Did the deed, Exhibit A, from Guthrie C. Pinnix and wife, Lula Pinnix, to Milas A. Swaim and wife, Ella R. Swaim vest in Milas A. Swaim and his wife, Ella R. Swaim, an estate by the entirety in fee simple in and to the 28.5 acre tract of land therein conveyed? The judgment is based upon an affirmative answer to this question. The ruling is in keeping with, and will be upheld upon authority of Artis v. Artis, 228 N.C. 754, 47 S.E. 2d 228, and Pilley v. Smith, 230 N.C. 62, 51 S.E. 2d 923, and the statute G.S. 39-1, which provides that a conveyance of real estate shall be held and construed to be a conveyance in fee “unless such conveyance, in plain and express words shows, or it is plainly intended by the conveyance or some part thereof, that the grantor meant to convey an estate of less dignity.”

¶2 Affirmed.

/235/nc/277 · .json · Public domain