Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 235 N.C. 550 - McDonald v. McCrummen

McDonald v. McCrummen’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
August 2002
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2002

20 state decisions

120195219601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mobley v. . Griffin · Locklear v. Oxendine · Keen v. . Parker · Stewart v. . Cary · Smith v. . Benson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It may be that O. B. Murchison is the heir, or an heir of the first, and as such could maintain an action against a third party to recover the land, [citation omitted] but the testimony of plaintiff is that “I do not know what kin O. B. Murchison was to A. A. Murchison, — they were some of my own people.” Titles to land may not rest in so thin veil of uncertainty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.