235 N.C. App. 315 - Keesee v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 202 N.C. App. 509 - McKoy v. McKoy · 121 N.C. App. 175 - Hursey v. Homes by Design, Inc. · State v. Bellamy · Melton v. Tindall Corp. · 173 N.C. App. 237 - In Re Pedestrian Walkway Failure
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]ppellate review of an interlocutory order is permissible if ... the order implicates a substantial right of the appellant that would be lost if the order was not reviewed prior to the issuance of a final judgment.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.