Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 235 Neb. 325 - State v. Yost

State v. Yost’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably State v. Moyer (2006), State v. Wells (1999)

30 state decisions

2001990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Kitt · State v. Duran · State v. Mentzer · State v. War Bonnett · State v. Arvizo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To determine the amount of restitution, the court may hold a hearing at the time of sentencing. The amount of restitution shall be based on the actual damages sustained by the victim and shall be supported by evidence which shall become a part of the court record. The court shall consider the defendant’s earning ability, employment status, financial resources, and family or other legal obligations and shall balance such considerations against the obligation to the victim.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Holecek · State v. McLain
  2. “A sentencing court may order the defendant to make restitution for the actual physical injury .. . sustained by the victim as a direct result of the offense for which the defendant has been convicted. Whenever the court believes that restitution may be a proper sentence . . . the court shall order that the presentence investigation report include documentation regarding the nature and amount of the actual damages sustained by the victim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. McLain

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.