Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

235 Neb. 96

Reed v. Reed

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1990

Nebraska Supreme Court · decided 1990-04-20

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 1997

6 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-04-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The petitioner-appellant father, William D. Reed, assigns as error the district court’s failure to modify the child support payments previously awarded the respondent-appellee mother, Sharon R. Reed.

¶2We, as required, have reviewed the district court’s action de novo on the record; we determine therefrom that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the father’s application. Accordingly, the action of the district court is affirmed.

¶3The mother is awarded the sum of $500 to apply toward the services of her attorney in this court.

¶4Affirmed.

Fahrnbruch, J., not participating.
/235/neb/96 · .json · Public domain