State v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 64 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably State v. Olkon (1980), State v. Marti (1980)
2 federal appellate · 64 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Griffin v. California · United States v. Calandra · Berger v. New York · Eisenstadt v. Baker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We therefore remand the case to the trial court with directions that an in camera inspection of grand jury transcripts be made in the presence of counsel for defendant and for the State [citations]. “We are really concerned with only about 275 pages of a total of 1250 pages of grand jury transcript. The remainder was already available to defendant before and during trial. “If such inspection discloses exculpatory evidence was suppressed, a new trial shall be granted. If not, the judgment shall stand affirmed. This is the practice approved in State v. White, supra, 260 at 1010, 151 N.W.2d at 557. “Of course, defendant’s right to appeal from the trial court’s in camera determination is preserved.” — 235 N.W.2d at 731 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Hall“If it appears from the bill of particulars furnished pursuant to this rule that the particulars stated do not constitute the offense charged in the indictment or information, or that the defendant did not commit that offense or that a prosecution for that offense is barred by the statute of limitations, the court may and on motion of defendant shall dismiss the indictment or information unless the prosecuting attorney shall furnish another bill of particulars which so states the particulars as to cure the defect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Wilt“must describe with particularity the items to be seized.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Frescoln
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.