¶1 Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co. (235 N. Y. 133).
¶2 Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
235 N.Y. 534
139 N.E 724
Decided February 27, 1923
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1923-02-27
Relies on General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1923-02-27
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently May 1970 · most notably Engl v. Ætna Life Ins. (1943), General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co. (1923)
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co. (235 N. Y. 133).
¶2 Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.