State v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2019
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mooney v. Holohan · Pyle v. State of Kansas · Hebert v. State of Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is improper for counsel to interject his personal appraisal of the witness's credibility in a way which would suggest to the jury that the appraisal is based upon counsel's own knowledge of facts not introduced into evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sperou“The jurors are triers of fact upon the evidence adduced * * * and they must exclude extraneous matters from consideration in arriving at their verdict[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Sperou“the acts or effects thereof constituting or requisite to the consummation of the offense occur... .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crittendon v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.