Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 235 PASUPER 160 - Commonwealth v. McKennion

Commonwealth v. McKennion’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2009

2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

701975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Davis v. United States · Commonwealth v. Clair · Commonwealth v. Nelson · Commonwealth v. Hill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Neither Section 3921 which details the crime nor Section 3901 which describes the property contains the element of value. We believe, therefore, that value is not an essential element of the crime of theft. Rather, the value of the stolen items becomes relevant only to establish the grade of the offense for purposes of imposing sentence.” Commonwealth v. McKennion, 235 Pa.Super. 160, 163 , 340 A.2d 889, 891 (1975).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.