Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 235 SW3D 392 - In Re Guerra

In Re Guerra’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy · Lassiter v. Department of Social Services of Durham County North Carolina · United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. · Walker v. Packer · Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Court has not previously decided the viability of the public interest exception, and we find it unnecessary to reach that issue here. As articulated by the court of appeals, the public interest exception permits judicial review of questions of considerable public importance if the nature of the action makes it capable of repetition and yet prevents effective judicial review. Thus, a common element of both the public interest exception and the capable of repetition exception is that the complained of action be capable of repetition yet not effectively reviewable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.