¶1 ORDER
¶2 Michael Lewis appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. We affirm.
¶3 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no *592 error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
¶4 The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).