Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 235 Va. 199 - Marriott v. Harris

Marriott v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
3
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably Belcher v. Kirkwood (1989), Mathews v. PHH Mortg. Corp. (2012)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 31 state decisions

25019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1701 (Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 1713 (Sherman Antitrust Act)

Relies on Rose v. Vulcan Materials Company · 244 Cal. App. 2d 666 - Citizens Suburban Co. v. Rosemont Development Co. · Maxey v. American Casualty Co. · Bain v. Boykin · Taylor v. Roeder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “PURCHASER . . . HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF A PROPERTY REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE INTERSTATE LAND SALES FULL DISCLOSURE ACT, THAT HE HAS READ AND UNDERSTANDS SUCH REPORT, [AND] THAT HE HAS INSPECTED THE LOT TO BE PURCHASED HEREBY.____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he law effective when the contract is made is as much a part of the contract as if incorporated therein.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “approved March 16, 1988, and made effective upon passage,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.