Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 236 ARK 85 - Wilhelm v. Taylor

Wilhelm v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 1998
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Harrison v. Matthews · Norton v. Purkins, Judge · Krone v. Cooper · Missouri Pac. R.R., Thompson, Trustee v. Lawrence

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any non-resident person . . . who shall do any. . . character of work or service in this State shall, by the doing of such . . . be deemed to have appointed the Secretary of State . . . to be the true and lawful attorney or agent of such non-resident, upon whom process may be served in any action accrued or accruing from. . . the performing of such work . . . by any such nonresident.. . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.