Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 236 ARK 853 - Rollie v. State

Rollie v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
November 2006
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2006

13 state decisions

4019631970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bell v. State · Smith v. State · Hinson v. State · Ashcraft v. State · Aydelotte v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This statute requires in unambiguous language that the entire jury and no less a number thereof must be present before the Court and counsel for the parties, or notice given to counsel, upon any proceeding affecting the rights of the defendant or the State as defined in this statute. Its provisions are mandatory. ***”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"The appellant alleges five assignments of error in her motion for a new trial. We group the first three assignments inasmuch as they question the sufficiency of the evidence. On appeal all the evidence submitted at the trial must be viewed in the light most favorable to a jury verdict and if there is any substantial evidence to support the verdict it is our duty to sustain it. Ashcraft v. State, 208 Ark. 1089 , 189 S. W. 2d 374 ; Smith v. State, 222 Ark. 650 , 262 S. W. 2d 272 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.