In Re Prince’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
November 2016
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 349 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 1409 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Dewsnup v. Timm · Andersen v. UNIPAC-NEBHELP · In Re Lee · In Re Pearson · In Re Leverett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.