Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 236 CALRPTR3D 174 - People v. Phung

People v. Phung’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Roper Superintendent Potosi Correctional Center v. Simmons · Miller v. Alabama · Miller v. Alabama · Graham v. Florida · 63 Cal. 2d 740 - In Re Estrada

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The crime of shooting at an occupied vehicle 'is not limited to shooting directly at [the] occupied target.' ( People v. Overman (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 1344 , 1355-1356, 24 Cal.Rptr.3d 798 .) Rather, the applicable statute 'proscribes shooting either directly at or in close proximity to an ... occupied target under circumstances showing a conscious disregard for the probability that one or more bullets will strike the target or persons in or around it.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.