Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 236 CONN 216 - State v. Trine

State v. Trine’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

178
cited by 178 later decisions
9
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 175 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 178 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably State v. Reynolds (2003), State v. Clark (2001)

3 federal appellate · 175 state decisions

11101996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Mapp v. Ohio · Brinegar v. United States · Chimel v. California · Sibron v. State of New York Peters

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 178 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Reasonable and articulable suspicion is an objective standard that focuses not on the actual state of mind of the police officer, but on whether a reasonable person, having the information available and known by the police, would have had that level of suspicion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “One recognized exception to the warrant requirement applies when a search is conducted incident to a lawful custodial arrest. . . . This exception permits a police officer to conduct a full search of an arrestee and to seize evidence as well as weapons.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[A] police officer may briefly detain an individual for investigative purposes if the officer has a reasonable and articulable suspicion that the individual has committed or is about to commit a crime.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.