David v. Newman’s Empirical Analysis
236 F. 501 · 1916
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on American Soda Fountain Co. v. Stolzenbach · 50 N.J. Eq. 120 - Graham Button Co. v. Spielmann · Howell v. Stone · Collerd v. Tully · Ordinary ex rel. Simpson v. Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(3) The statement that ‘there is due’ upon the mortgage the sum of $3,000 is false, in that no mortgage consideration had passed upon the date of the affidavit, and no sum was then due to any one. “(4) The statement that there is ‘to grow due’ on the mortgage the sum of $3,000 if intended to cover the contemplated loan by installments, wholly fails to disclose the nature and to verify the truth of the consideration to arise out of that transaction. “(5) The statement of the debt ‘due and to grow due,’ considered with reference to the real transaction, is so general and indefinite, and fails so completely to disclose what was actually intended, that it plainly contravenes the fundamental purpose of the legislation. If such a statement were held to be a substantial compliance with the law, the very object of the statute would unquestionably be defeated.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Swain
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.