Lett v. United States

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1956.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1956-06-06

2 counsel of record

Relies on 143 F. Supp. 594 - United States v. Lett

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1956-06-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 1970

2 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Stephen M. D. Burns, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellants.

¶2Hugh K. Martin, Columbus, Ohio, James E. Rambo, Dayton, Ohio, for ap-pellee.

¶3Before ALLEN, McALLISTER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

¶6Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Cecil, 143 F.Supp. 594.