James Tyler’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
9 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably 134 F. Supp. 2d 1111 - United States v. Westlands Water District (2001), American Greyhound Racing, Inc. v. Hull (2001)
9 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization · Bennett v. Spear · Agostini v. Felton Chancellor Board of Education of the City of New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“prior to expending federal funds on or issuing any federal license for the project. The § 106 review process consists of (1) identifying the resource that is eligible for listing on the National Register that would be affected by the federal undertaking; (2) determining if the effect could be adverse; and (3) if so, consulting with the State Historic Preservation Officer (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Stipulation 5 of the MOA specifically provide[d] that if a `member of the public' makes a written complaint, `the City shall take the objection into account and consult as needed with the objecting party.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“because they lack[ed] privity of contract and [were] not intended beneficiaries of the MOA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.