Office of Thrift Supervision v. Overland Park Financial Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
236 F.3d 1246 · 2001
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 18 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians v. Pierce (2001), In Re Miniscribe Corporation
14 federal appellate · 18 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Church of Scientology of California v. United States · Mills v. Green · Cohen v. De La Cruz · Toliver v. County of Sullivan · United States v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that could be appealed to this court. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 158 (d), 1291. We now conclude that the order was final and appealable. As the parties acknowledge, the bankruptcy court's only task on remand would have been to dismiss the trustee's complaint, and to dismiss the third-party complaint as moot. These ministerial actions would not have involved significant further proceedings on remand. A district court order that leaves the bankruptcy court with”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“assumption and cure under § 365(o) are prerequisites to obtaining Chapter 11 protection. If a debtor cannot “immediately” cure a deficit under a capital maintenance commitment that exists at the time of a bankruptcy filing, then § 365(o) requires that debtor to proceed not under Chapter 11 but under Chapter 7, to which § 365(o) does not apply.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When interpreting statutory language, this court 'must look to the particular statutory language at issue, as well as the language and design of the statute as a whole.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.