Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 236 F.3d 1316 - Travel Centre v. David J. Barram, Administrator, General Services Administration, David J. Barram, Administrator, General Services Adminstration v. Travel Centre

Travel Centre v. David J. Barram, Administrator, General Services Administration, David J. Barram, Administrator, General Services Adminstration v. Travel Centre’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2024

1 state decisions

110200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stratos Mobile Networks USA, LLC v. United States · Mason v. United States · Roseburg Lumber Co v. Madigan · Medart, Inc. v. Austin · Dot Systems, Inc. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[O]nce the government has purchased the minimum quantity stated in an IDIQ contract from the contractor, it is free to purchase additional supplies or services from any other source it chooses. An IDIQ contract does not provide any exclusivity to the contractor. The government may, at its discretion and for its benefit, make its purchases for similar supplies and/or services from other sources.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Regardless of the accuracy of the estimates delineated in the solicitation, based on the language of the solicitation for the IDIQ contract, Travel Centre could not have had a reasonable expectation that any of the government’s needs beyond the minimum contract price would necessarily be satisfied under this contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.