Humane Society of the United States v. Clinton’s Empirical Analysis
236 F.3d 1320 · 2001
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Consolidated Bearings Company v. United States (2003), 435 F. Supp. 2d 1261 - Shandong Huarong MacHinery Co. v. United States (2006)
8 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Powell v. McCormack · United States v. Mitchell · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyer · United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP) · Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]his Court will apply the standard of review set forth in 5 U.S.C. § 706 to an action instituted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Section] 1581 not only states the jurisdictional grant to the Court of International Trade, but also provides a waiver of sovereign immunity over the specified classes of cases.”). 14 . The Tembec II Court found further support for its conclusion that liquidation should occur in accordance with a NAFTA panel’s final decision based upon the absence of language in § 1516a(g)(5)(C) permitting an order of liquidation during or after the appeals process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We conclude that the trial court was correct when it held that the question of whether consultations were `satisfactorily concluded,' and thus whether the requirement for import sanctions was triggered, is a matter that lies within the broad discretion of the President.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.