United States v. Studnicka

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 21, 2007

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2007-08-21

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2010

1 federal appellate ·

Relies on Anders v. California

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-08-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM: *

¶1 The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sean Alen Studnicka has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Studnicka has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The Government’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.

¶2 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.