Ali v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 1611 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 301 (§ 1 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Plummer v. Apfel · Halloran v. Barnhart · Wilson v. Barnhart · Coffman v. Bowen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]ther factors concerning [the claimant's] functional limitations and restrictions due to pain.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he type, dosage, effectiveness, and side effects of any medication”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“location, duration, frequency, and intensity of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.