Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 236 Ga. 534 - Arnold v. State

Arnold v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

129
cited by 129 later decisions
18
cited 18 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 79 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 129 later decisions (18 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2015 · most notably Gregg v. Georgia (1976), Zant v. Stephens (1983)

22 federal appellate · 79 state decisions — followed in 11 states

77019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Witherspoon v. Illinois · Furman v. Georgia · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Smith v. Goguen · United States v. James Griggs Raines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 129 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “substantial history of serious assaultive criminal convictions”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “not provide the sufficiently 'clear and objective standards' necessary to control the jury's discretion in imposing the death penalty.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““This doctrine has particular application to death penalty statutes after Furman v. Georgia, supra, where, if anything is made clear, it is that a wide latitude of discretion in a jury as to whether or not to impose the death penalty is unconstitutional”. ( 224 S.E.2d at 391 ).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.