Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 236 Ga. App. 330 - Jones v. State

236 Ga. App. 330 - Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2015

17 state decisions

130199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. State · State v. Belt · 213 Ga. App. 80 - Galbreath v. State · 211 Ga. App. 256 - Rodriguez v. State · Chambers v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A much greater degree of similarity between the charged crime and the uncharged crime is required when the evidence of the other crime is introduced to prove identity than when it is introduced to prove a state of mind. Much more is demanded than the mere repeated commission of crimes of the same class, such as repeated murders, robberies, or rapes. The pattern and characteristics of the crimes must be so unusual and distinctive as to be like a signature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Independent crimes are admissible to show motive, intent, plan, identity, bent of mind or course of conduct. In order for any independent acts to be admissible [,] it must be shown that the defendant was the perpetrator of the independent crime and that there is sufficient similarity of the former independent crime that it tends to prove the latter crime.” 2”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.