236 Ga. App. 530 - Townsend v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2017
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Price v. State · Perano v. State · 209 Ga. App. 474 - Krebsbach v. State · 200 Ga. App. 442 - Talley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] trial court has discretion to quash an unreasonable and oppressive subpoena, and abuse of discretion is the appropriate standard of review in such situations. OCGA § 24-10- 22 (b) (1); [cit.] Whether the trial court should quash a subpoena depends on the nature and scope of the discovery request. [Cit.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.