Guy v. SCHULDT’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 146 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 195 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Canterbury v. Spence (1972), 333 So. 2d 25 - Nardone v. Reynolds (1976)
28 federal appellate · 146 state decisions — followed in 16 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fanchon & Marco, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. · Mayo v. United States · Sherfey v. City of Brazil · Evansville Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Winsor · Automobile Underwriters, Inc. v. Rich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 195 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘The intentional deception, relied upon by another which induces him to part with property or surrender a legal right...’ Guy v. Schuldt (1956) 236 Ind. 101 , 138 N.E.2d 891 .”
21 later decisions quote this exact passage“within two (2) years from the date of the act, omission or neglect complained of.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage““2-609. Concealment of cause of action. — If any person liable to an action, shall conceal the fact from the knowledge of the person entitled thereto, the action may be commenced at any time within the period of limitations, after the discovery of the cause of action.””
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.