Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 236 Ind. 509 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
August 1980
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 1980 · most notably Shipman v. State (1962), Weaver v. State (1963)

29 state decisions

1701957196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baker v. State · Abraham v. State · Christen v. State · Todd v. State · State v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““First: Venue must be proven to sustain a conviction; Strickland v. State (1909), 171 Ind. 642, 645 , 87 N.E. 12 ; however, no more direct or convincing evidence is required to establish it than is required to prove any other essential fact in the case. State v. Jackson (1918), 187 Ind. 694, 699 , 121 N.E. 114 . There is direct evidence to show that the deceased lived and worked in Indianapolis, Indiana, that he was seen in the vicinity of 614 North California Street on the night of February 15, 1955, and that his dead body was found in the alley at the rear of 614 North California Street, Indianapolis, Marion County, Indiana, at about 7 o’clock on the morning of February 16, 1955. We believe this is sufficient evidence from which the jury might properly have inferred that the alleged crime was committed in Marion County, Indiana. See: Beavers v. The State (1877), 58 Ind. 530, 536 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.