Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 236 IND 663 - Kleinmeyer v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Kleinmeyer v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1984
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stair v. Meissel · Sellers v. Stoffel · Bufkin v. Boyce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is further difficult to see how the property or security was in danger of being lost or materially injured, or appellee’s rights endangered where the real estate here in question, according to appellee’s petition, was of an estimated value of almost $5,000.00 more than the combined indebtedness accruing against appellants and the property, and there was no showing that appellee’s action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien would suffer without a receiver.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “in danger of being lost, removed or materially injured ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.