Hampton v. Burrell’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 1996
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Davidson v. Vast · Mason v. Braught · In Re Estate of Hermence · Munkacsy v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. · Rosenblum v. Dingfelder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(a) Jury trial is waived if not demanded according to this rule; * * *. (b) A party desiring jury trial of an issue must make demand therefor by filing a separate instrument clearly designating such demand not later than ten days after the last pleading directed to that issue. * * *. (c) * * *. (d) * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mills v. Lyon“Unless limited to a specific issue, every such demand shall be deemed to include all issues triable to a jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the last pleading directed to that issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.