Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 236 Kan. 132 - State v. Baker

State v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2018

10 state decisions

401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Garcia · State v. Boan · State v. Nemechek · State v. Mantz · State v. Sanders

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It appears that counsel desired more time to better explain things to defendant. Defense counsel did not suggest that there should be a new competency hearing. This in-chambers conference should not be considered a competency proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “was having trouble understanding the proceedings. Counsel simply asked for the court's patience while he was talking to his client.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “evidence was undisputed that the defendant was suffering from ... a severe mental illness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.