Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 236 Kan. 555 - State v. Keeley

State v. Keeley’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably Chiles v. State (1994), State v. Scherzer (1994)

2 federal appellate · 56 state decisions

26019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Freeman · State v. McDaniel & Owens · Wirt v. Esrey · Thomas Ex Rel. Thomas v. Board of Township Trustees · State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The power to prescribe the penalty to be imposed for the commission of a crime rests exclusively with the legislature, not the courts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.