Lutes v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1930
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2001
most recently cited
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“who procures for another the gratification for his lusts. He is a panderer who solicits trade for a prostitute, or lewd woman.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.