Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 236 La. 767 - White v. Morris

White v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
states following
May 1986
most recently cited

47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently May 1986 · most notably 352 So. 2d 1013 - Halcomb v. Halcomb (1977), 404 So. 2d 1230 - Lewis v. Lewis (1981)

47 state decisions

2401959196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Eals v. Swan · Bowsky v. Silverman · Bienvenue v. Bienvenue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled that a judgment requiring payment of alimony pendente lite is automatically terminated and of no further effect after the rendition of a final decree of divorce. Bowsky v. Silverman, 184 La. 977 , 168 So. 121 ; Bienvenue v. Bienvenue, 186 La. 429 , 172 So. 516 ; Eals v. Swan, 221 La. 329 , 59 So.2d 409 . Although the dissolution of marriage does not dissolve the obligation of support for the children, yet this obligation must be judicially enforced and until that is done there can be no recovery of alimony. The alimony awarded during the pendency of a suit for divorce ceases upon the rendition of a final judgment of divorce. Bowsky v. Silverman, supra. In the Bow-sky case the alimony awarded pendente lite was not only for the support of the wife but for the support of a minor son.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.