State v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2018 · most notably Garner v. State of Louisiana Briscoe (1961), 165 Ill. 2d 305 - People v. Lewis (1995)
7 federal appellate · 46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morissette v. United States · Texas Co v. Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks · State v. Truby · Banovitch v. Commonwealth · Hargrove v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Specific criminal intent is that state of mind which exists when the circumstances indicate that the offender actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act or failure to act.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Public intimidation is the use of violence, force, or threats upon any of the following persons, with the intent to influence his conduct in relation to his position, employment, or duty: (1) Public officer or public employee."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Love · State v. Hall“is sufficiently broad to include police officers. The critical inquiry is whether the evidence, both direct and circumstantial, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient for any rational trier of fact to conclude that Love's threatening comments directed toward White and the latter's family were made with the requisite specific intent to influence Officer White's conduct in relation to his position, employment, or duty. Specific intent, defined in La.R.S. 14:10(1), is”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Love · State v. Burgess
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.