Ballard v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 1995
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mulcahy v. State · Anello v. State · Fletcher v. State · Mazer v. State · People v. Ramistella
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No cases were cited to us, nor have we found any, holding that one who is guilty of the unauthorized use of a motor vehicle may also be said to have been a participant in the larceny of the same vehicle. On the contrary, the cases in this state as well as those in other states recognize that the two offenses are separate and distinct and that one cannot be convicted of both larceny and unauthorized use. See Fletcher v. State, 231 Md. 190 , 189 A. 2d 641 (1963); Anello v. State, 201 Md. 164 , 93 A. 2d 71 (1952); People v. Ramistella, [ 306 N. Y. 379, 385 ,] 118 N.E.2d 566 (1954); People v. Tellez, [ 32 Cal.App.2d 217, 219 ,] 89 P. 2d 451 (1939); Eastway v. State, [ 189 Wis. 56, 58 ,] 206 N. W. 879 (1926). See also 8A Blashfield, Cyclopedia of Automobile Law and Practice, § 5612.” Id. at 581-82.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Henry v. State““Robert Ballard and Glenn Lewis were jointly charged in a three-count indictment with the larceny, receiving and unauthorized use of an automobile. Lewis pled guilty to the unauthorized use of it, and Ballard was convicted of the larceny thereof on the uncorroborated testimony of Lewis. The critical question presented on this appeal is whether Lewis was an accomplice of Ballard.” Id. at 580 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Henry v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.