Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 236 Miss. 1 - Aultman v. Kelly

Aultman v. Kelly’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
2
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably McMahon v. McMahon (1963), Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Edwards (1990)

9 federal appellate · 40 state decisions

1701959196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Forman v. Mississippi Publishers Corp. · Walley v. HUNT · Cook v. Farley · Milam v. Paxton · Kennedy v. Sanders

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] cause of action accrues only when it comes into existence as an enforceable claim,”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] person may not make an entry or commence an action to recover land except within ten years next after the time at which the right to make the entry or to bring the action shall have first accrued to some person through whom he claims, or, if the right shall not have accrued to any person through whom he claims, then except within ten years next after the time at which the right to make the entry or bring the action shall have first accrued to the person making or bringing the same... .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]here the alleged fraudulent conveyance is recorded, the circumstances are public and the means of finding out the character of the transaction is available. Consequently, the running of the statute of limitations is not prevented”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.