Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 236 MO 575 - Cantwell v. Johnson

Cantwell v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
3
states following
October 1980
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently October 1980 · most notably Daffin v. Daffin (1978), Seven Provinces Insurance v. Commerce & Industry Insurance (1975)

26 state decisions

8019111920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Donovan v. Boeck · Hall v. First National Bank of Chelsea · Wingate v. Haywood · Murphy v. De France · Thornton v. Irwin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But the courts have a wise and natural aversion to overthrowing judgments. There must be an end to litigation in the interest of the State and for the repose of society; therefore when the help of a court of equity is asked to undo what has already been done and adjudged by a court, fraud in the cause of action itself, in false allegations or false testimony, will not suffice. . . . So, where fraud, accident, surprise or mistake is the ground for equitable .relief against a judgment, plaintiff must come into court with a cause unmixed with his own negligence or fault; for ‘ ‘ no man is entitled to the aid of a court of equity, when that aid becomes necessary by his own fault. ’ 1 ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.