¶1 Appeal to the Supreme Court does not lie from a discretionary determination of an application for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. See S. v. Suddreth, 230 N.C. 754, 55 S.E. 2d 690; also S. v. Thomas, 227 N.C. 71, 40 S.E. 2d 412; S. v. Rodgers, 217 N.C. 622, 8 S.E. 2d 927; S. v. Lea, 203 N.C. 316 (at 322), 166 S.E. 292, and cases there cited. Also S. v. Grass, 223 N.C. 859, 27 S.E. 2d 443; S. v. Parker, 235 N.C. 302, 69 S.E. 2d 542.
¶2 Hence under the authority of these cases the appeal in the present case is
¶3 Dismissed.