236 N.C. App. 415 - State v. Hull’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Odom · State v. Lawrence · 186 N.C. App. 57 - State v. Smith · State v. Gregory · 196 N.C. App. 458 - State v. Osorio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The standard of review for [the] application of mitigating factors is an abuse of discretion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“property is stolen from the person, if it was under the protection of the person at the time. Property may be under the protection of the person although not actually attached to him[;] for that which is taken in his presence, is in law taken from his person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Little“(1) taking the property of another; (2) carrying it away; (3) without the owner's consent; and (4) with intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.