State v. Plant’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 69 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably State v. Jacob (1998), State v. McBride (1996)
6 federal appellate · 69 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In Re Interest of RA
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“I concur because I believe the statements were admissible under Nebraska's residual hearsay exceptions in Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 27-803(22) and 27-804(2)(e) (Reissue 1989) for the reasons set out in the majority opinion. I believe, however, that for this court to hold that the child's statements were "excited utterances" extends that doctrine to extraordinary and improper lengths.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“key requirement is that the statement be made without time for conscious reflection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.