Gray v. Pope’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2005
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Vespe v. DiMarco · State v. Corby · Juliano v. Abeles · 94 N.J. Super. 452 - Parentini v. S. Klein Dept. Stores · 132 Wis. 2d 289 - Suhaysik v. Milwaukee Cheese Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in order to hold that the finding of a jury is a quotient verdict it must also appear that there was a positive prior agreement to abide by the result of this process, and even if there may have been such an agreement, if the jury subsequently refused to abide by it, and find a verdict greater or less than the quotient, it would not be error. [Ibid.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Shankman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.