236 N.J. Super. 298 - State v. Hyman’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2003
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Griffin v. Wisconsin · State v. Mulcahy · 156 N.J. Super. 516 - State v. Gibson · 169 N.J. Super. 553 - State v. Bollinger · 202 N.J. Super. 398 - State v. Mulcahy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the issue is not before us in the present case, we assume that the preparation of a formal notice of violations and the issuance of a warrant for the probationer’s arrest would constitute the “commencement of a probation revocation proceeding” which would toll the probationary period, provided that reasonably diligent efforts to effect service were unsuccessful. [ 235 N.J.Super. at 297 , 562 A.2d at 238-39 (emphasis added).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Nellom
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.