236 N.J. Super. 6 - State v. Torres’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2024
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 801 (§ 101 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Carnegie v. United States · Brame v. United States · United States v. Wood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“independent of any other ground. VI. The judgments of conviction are reversed, and the matter is remanded for a new trial. NOTES [1] The defense produced witnesses who borrowed money from defendants and used pagers to contact Featherston for legitimate purposes, including use incident to the softball team. Featherston testified that during the house search the phone range and Officer Price answered the phone and said”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a controlled dangerous substance or controlled substance analog.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“less than 3.5 grams of the pure free base....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.