State v. Vawter’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1999
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(e) If trial is not had on any indictment, information or complaint contemplated hereby prior to the prisoner's being returned to the original place of imprisonment pursuant to paragraph (e) of Article V of this agreement, such indictment, information or complaint shall not be of any further force or effect, and the court shall enter an order dismissing the same with prejudice. " ORS 135.775 (emphasis added). [6] On a similar note, the parties have directed us to an Oregon Supreme Court case that indicates in dictum that former ORS 134.510 et seq. "appears to have been patterned after a similar statute of California.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A continuance may be granted upon the request of the district attorney and with the consent of the inmate. The court shall grant any continuance with the consent of the defendant. The court may grant a continuance on motion of the district attorney for good cause shown. The fact of imprisonment is not good cause for the purposes of this subsection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Person“"Necessarily, there will always be delay greater or less in bringing an accused to trial. Legislation recognizes that a delay of 60 days in indicting a defendant who has been held to answer is reasonable. [ Former ] ORS 134.110. Other reasonable delays, about which the trial judge knows and this court does not, frequently occur." [15]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Person
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.