Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 236 Or. 98 - State v. Hoffman

State v. Hoffman’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
10
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2018

24 state decisions — followed in 10 states

80196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on James Graham v. State of West Virginia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In our opinion, the words `criminal prosecution,' as set forth in Article I, Section 11 of our constitution, refer to establishing before a jury acts declared to be criminal by legislative action. Since proof of prior crimes is not a proper matter in an indictment for a present crime, but only proof that prior punishment has not been effective to reform the person, the defendant was not entitled to a jury trial relative to his prior convictions. * * *" 236 Or. at 107 , 385 P.2d at 741 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right to public trial by an impartial jury * * *.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The duty of determining the extent of the penalty to be imposed in a criminal case * * * is by law imposed upon the trial judge. The extent of that punishment is legislative, limited only by the constitutional prohibition against cruel and inhuman punishment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.