236 Pa. Super. 474 - Commonwealth v. Keysock’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently January 2013 · most notably 329 Pa. Super. 148 - Commonwealth v. Balisteri (1984), 364 Pa. Super. 521 - Commonwealth v. Gordon (1987)
50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Commonwealth v. Clair · Commonwealth v. Agie · Commonwealth v. Goodwin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A litigant must do two things in order to preserve an issue. First, he must make a timely, specific objection at trial. Commonwealth v. Williams, 458 Pa. 319 , 326 A.2d 300 (1974); Commonwealth v. Kuterbach, 458 Pa. 318 , 326 A.2d 283 (1974); Commonwealth v. Clair, 458 Pa. 418 , 326 A.2d 272 (1974). And second, he must raise the issue on post-trial motion. Commonwealth v. Belvins, supra; Commonwealth v. Bronaugh, supra; Commonwealth v. Kearney, supra; Commonwealth v. Reid, supra; Commonwealth v. Agie, supra.” Keysock, p. 478-79.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.