Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 236 S.C. 257 - Hall v. Murphy

Hall v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
11
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently January 2013 · most notably Humes v. Clinton (1990), Fussner v. Andert (1961)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 35 state decisions — followed in 11 states

220196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Woods v. Lancet · Verkennes v. Corniea · Dietrich v. Inhabitants of Northampton · RAINEY v. Horn · Poliquin v. MacDonald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We have no difficulty in concluding that a foetus having reached that period of prenatal maturity where it is capable of independent life apart from its mother is a person and if such a child is injured, it may after birth maintain an action for such injuries. A few courts have gone further and held that such an action may be maintained even if the infant had not reached the state of a viable foetus at the time of the injury. [Citations omitted.] This question is not presented and we intimate no opinion thereabout. Our decision is limited to liability for prenatal injuries to a viable child born alive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Having concluded that had (the child) lived, she could have maintained an action for any prenatal injury caused by defendant’s negligence, it follows that the two, actions (personal injury and wrongful death) now under consideration could be brought by her administrator.” (Interpolation ours.) 236 S. C. 263, 113 S. E. (2d) 793 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.